IPART Review of NSW Biodiversity Credit Market released

Mark Evans • October 18, 2024

The Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal (IPART) has released a summary of workshops and stakeholders’ submissions concerning the functioning of the NSW Biodiversity Credits Market.

In late September of 2024, the IPART held a series of consultation workshops to hear stakeholders' views on the performance of the credits market.


The key findings of the IPART Review are that the biodiversity credits market is not operating effectively in 5 key areas:


  1. The option for development proponents to pay into the Biodiversity Conservation Fund prevents the market from developing.
  2. High up-front costs and long credit generation times create a lag between credit demand and supply. The Credits Supply Taskforce work program is making a difference.
  3. Market participants lack accurate and timely information.
  4. High transaction costs and market complexity discourage participation.
  5. Stakeholders lack confidence in market oversight and governance, which hinders their participation.


These are fundamental issues that, if unaddressed, will continue to prevent the market from functioning effectively. To address these issues, the IPART recommends the following priority actions:


  1. Phase out the option to pay into the Biodiversity Conservation Fund.
  2. Establish interim measures to reduce proponents’ reliance on the Fund pay-in option.
  3.  Continue to intervene in the market to reduce entry costs, make trading more efficient and instil confidence in the market.


The Scheme, and these issues, are not going anywhere soon.


The IPART has published a summary of the stakeholder workshops on its website. The summary outlines the main themes and issues raised by stakeholders at these workshops and can be accessed here: https://www.ipart.nsw.gov.au/ipart-biodiversity-market-monitoring-2023-24-stakeholder-workshops



Require further Assistance? Please do not hesitate to call us on (02) 9145 0900 or make an enquiry below.

Mark Evans Director Whiteacre Legal

Servicing all of NSW, Whiteacre provides expert property law and planning and environment law advice and assistance.

Planning Law Advice

Land and Environment Court Appeals

Voluntary Planning Agreements and Contributions

Development Control Orders and Enforcement

Property Development Advice and Due Diligence

Title Structuring

Easements and Covenants

Strata and Community Title legislation

Book an initial consultation through our website with our planning law solicitor. Whether it's about planning and environment law or property law, you can approach us and discuss your matter to make sure we are a good fit for your requirements.

BOOK ONLINE
Navigating Land and Environment Court
By Mark Evans March 20, 2025
Expert Legal Insights on Development Approvals and Appeals with Planning Lawyer Mark Evans
Physical Commencement of Development Consents
By Mark Evans February 27, 2025
Development consents granted after 15 May 2020 face stricter requirements to determine whether they are substantially commenced and thus remain valid. This article reviews recent case law in New South Wales (NSW) and outlines the types of work that can qualify as physical commencement.
shared driveways
By Mark Evans February 13, 2025
Shared driveways A common example of a shared driveway is where a right of carriageway passes through one neighbours’ (burdened) land into the other neighbour’s (benefited) land.
tiny homes
By Mark Evans November 27, 2024
In Part 1, we considered tiny homes and caravans on private land. That article can be accessed here Part 1 . In Part 2, we turn our attention to tiny homes and manufactured homes.
tiny homes
By Mark Evans November 22, 2024
In this article we explore tiny homes, caravans, and manufactured homes.
By Mark Evans and William Jamieson November 14, 2024
The general rule is that a development application ( DA ) is to be determined based on the law applicable at the time of determination of the DA, not at the time of lodgement: Sofi v Wollondilly Shire Council (1975) 31 LGERA 416.
When subdivision may not be considered development carried out on land
By Mark Evans and William Jamieson October 31, 2024
Subdivision, alone, may not constitute development “on land” and thus trigger development restrictions. 
Development
By Mark Evans and William Jamieson October 10, 2024
It is now well established that a development consent cannot be obtained to authorise works that have already been carried out. The classic example is a building that has been built without development consent.
Planning law
By Mark Evans and William Jamieson September 26, 2024
This article discusses the characterisation of land use in NSW planning law.
Private Land
By Mark Evans and Ryan Post September 5, 2024
Public infrastructure like sewerage pipes and stormwater pipes were often constructed a long time ago with no development approval or accurate record keeping. Over time, these assets have remained in place and often the local council authority either has no record of the infrastructure or knowledge of the history of construction of the asset or its ownership. Ideally, Council would have an easement registered on title to the subject land. This can cause huge problems when seeking to develop land with old infrastructure emplaced within the subject site.
More Posts
Share by: