Appeal a DA refusal or request a review

Mark Evans • March 14, 2024

If your development application (DA) has been sitting with Council for a long time (deemed refusal) or has actually been refused (actual refusal) this article can help you understand your options, the process involved and how you can navigate the planning process more effectively.

Review or Appeal: Understanding the Difference


If your development application has been refused, you have three options:


  1. Request a review of the decision;
  2. Appeal to the Land and Environment Court;
  3. Start again from scratch (admittedly not a great option).


Section 8.3 Review


A review of the decision can be requested under section 8.3 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (EPA Act).


The review is conducted by the same consent authority that made the original decision, usually the Council.


Requesting a review ensures that a senior officer within the consent authority will re-examine the decision.


Careful consideration is required when deciding between a review or an appeal. You only have 6 months from the date of the determination to commence an appeal and need to be careful that the appeal deadline does not expire while you wait for the review to be completed. 


Requirements for a Review


A review must be lodged within six months of the date of determination if a Class 1 appeal has not been commenced.


The application for a review should include detailed reasons, relevant documents, and proposed amendments (if applicable).


The consent authority will internally re-examine the application in response to a valid review request.


Outcome of a Review


The consent authority can approve, modify, or reaffirm the refusal of the application.


In our experience, unless an error is found or new information is provided, the review often results in the Council maintaining its initial decision. This usually results in the Applicant wasting further time waiting for the review to be finalised when they could have used that time to run an appeal.


Class 1 Appeal


The second option is an appeal under section 8.7 of the EPA Act against the actual (or deemed) refusal of a DA.


Actual vs deemed refusal


Actual refusal of a development application occurs if the consent authority determines the DA by way of refusal. Deemed refusal occurs where the DA has been under assessment by the consent authority for longer than the prescribed time limit (42 days or 62 days depending on the type of development).


When to start an Appeal


You can appeal to the NSW Land and Environment Court if you are dissatisfied with the determination of your DA (either the deemed refusal or actual refusal).


You will need to carefully consider the time limitations for commencing an appeal. In most cases, you only have 6 months from the date of the determination to commence an appeal. 


Process of a Class 1 Appeal


Set out below is a summary of the appeal process.

DA process

Step 1 – An appeal is commenced by filing an application with the NSW Land and Environment Court.


Step 2 – The first time the appeal comes before the Court is the first directions hearing. Parties should be prepared for the first directions hearing to discuss the suitability of conciliation, proposed directions, and hearing dates. The Court will set a date for a conciliation conference (s 34 Conference) to take place.


Step 3 – The conciliation conference takes place. Most Class 1 appeals are resolved through conciliation. The Court encourages parties to engage in meaningful way to attempt to reach agreement and resolve disputes. The conciliation conference commences with a site visit together with the Commissioner and experts from both parties. The Court then reconvenes (usually at Council chambers) to hear submissions and allow experts to confer privately and resolve issues.


Step 4 – If agreement is reached, the matter proceeds to a further directions hearing to finalise the conditions of consent. The Court will then grant consent to the DA.


Step 5 - If agreement cannot be reached, the matter proceeds to a final hearing where arguments and evidence are presented. Both parties and their experts attend and give evidence at the hearing.


Step 6 - The Court will then deliver a judgment either granting or refusing consent to the proposed development.


Costs


Each party bears their own costs in Class 1 proceedings, and costs are rarely awarded against a party unless that party is found to have engaged in unreasonable behaviour or deliberate delays.


It is very hard to estimate how much a Class 1 appeal will cost.


The majority of the costs involved will be consultants’ fees, not legal expenses. Most Class 1 appeals would range from $30,000 for a very simple matter with limited issues up to $80,000 for a more complex matter with multiple issues.


You should budget on reaching agreement during conciliation and limiting your costs, but be prepared that the matter may need to go all the way to a final hearing if some issues cannot be resolved.


Case study


In a recent case, the Applicant lodged a development application for retail development of a heritage building. The proposal was supported by reputable and considered heritage advice.


Council’s heritage adviser supported the development but suggested some design changes.


Six months later, Council raised RFI’s (request for further information) and asked for a contamination report and some further reports. These were provided.


After a further 6 months, Council’s heritage adviser was replaced, and the new heritage adviser suggested radical changes to the building façade. Council raised further RFI’s for more information.


The design changes were adopted, and further information provided to Council. More reports, more consultants, more delay, more expense. The Applicant sought legal advice but ultimately chose to continue to work with Council, trusting that the consent was only a matter of time.


Six months later (now 18 months from lodgement), Council’s second heritage adviser left and a new heritage adviser was appointed. The new heritage adviser suggested the Applicant revert back to the original design! The Applicant refused to make the changes and the DA was determined by way of refusal.

The Applicant commenced an appeal against the refusal. Council raised a host of new (and creative) contentions as to why the development should be refused.


The Class 1 proceedings took approximately 6 months. Ultimately, the Land and Environment Court granted consent to the development application and was critical of Council’s treatment of the heritage issue. The Applicant ultimately sold the commercial retail space at a significant profit. 


Conclusion:


Unless an error is found or new information is provided, a s 8.3 review often results in the Council confirming its original decision.


If your DA has been with Council for a long time or has actually been refused, you can appeal to the NSW Land and Environment Court.


An appeal must be commenced within 6 months of the date of determination of the DA.


The majority of Class 1 appeals are resolved through the conciliation process.


It will always be a commercial decision whether to spend the money to commence an appeal or wait and continue to work with Council.


That commercial decision must take into account the cost of the appeal but also the opportunity cost of doing nothing, weighing the cost of taking action against the cost in terms of delay, consultant’s fees and rising construction costs.


Require further assistance? please do not hesitate to call us on (02) 9145 0900 or make an enquiry below.

Mark Evans Director Whiteacre Legal

Servicing all of NSW, Whiteacre provides expert property law and planning and environment law advice and assistance.

Planning Law Advice

Land and Environment Court Appeals

Voluntary Planning Agreements and Contributions

Development Control Orders and Enforcement

Property Development Advice and Due Diligence

Title Structuring

Easements and Covenants

Strata and Community Title legislation

Book an initial consultation through our website with our planning law solicitor. Whether it's about planning and environment law or property law, you can approach us and discuss your matter to make sure we are a good fit for your requirements.

BOOK ONLINE
tiny homes
By Mark Evans November 27, 2024
In Part 1, we considered tiny homes and caravans on private land. That article can be accessed here Part 1 . In Part 2, we turn our attention to tiny homes and manufactured homes.
tiny homes
By Mark Evans November 22, 2024
In this article we explore tiny homes, caravans, and manufactured homes.
By Mark Evans and William Jamieson November 14, 2024
The general rule is that a development application ( DA ) is to be determined based on the law applicable at the time of determination of the DA, not at the time of lodgement: Sofi v Wollondilly Shire Council (1975) 31 LGERA 416.
When subdivision may not be considered development carried out on land
By Mark Evans and William Jamieson October 31, 2024
Subdivision, alone, may not constitute development “on land” and thus trigger development restrictions. 
Biodiversity Credits
By Mark Evans October 18, 2024
The Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal (IPART) has released a summary of workshops and stakeholders’ submissions concerning the functioning of the NSW Biodiversity Credits Market.
Development
By Mark Evans and William Jamieson October 10, 2024
It is now well established that a development consent cannot be obtained to authorise works that have already been carried out. The classic example is a building that has been built without development consent.
Planning law
By Mark Evans and William Jamieson September 26, 2024
This article discusses the characterisation of land use in NSW planning law.
Private Land
By Mark Evans and Ryan Post September 5, 2024
Public infrastructure like sewerage pipes and stormwater pipes were often constructed a long time ago with no development approval or accurate record keeping. Over time, these assets have remained in place and often the local council authority either has no record of the infrastructure or knowledge of the history of construction of the asset or its ownership. Ideally, Council would have an easement registered on title to the subject land. This can cause huge problems when seeking to develop land with old infrastructure emplaced within the subject site.
By Mark Evans August 29, 2024
This article discusses tax implications of establishing a biodiversity stewardship site and generating biodiversity credits.
Biodiversity Laws Reviews
By William Jamieson and Mark Evans August 9, 2024
Legislation in NSW aimed at protecting biodiversity is not working. The current system is complex and there are many reasons for failure. This article considers recent review of the NSW biodiversity legislation.
More Posts
Share by: