How to Know if Your Neighbour Has to Contribute for the New Fence

Mark Evans • October 8, 2019

Well, that depends on a number of things but the general rule is:


Where there is no sufficient dividing fence your neighbour must contribute to the carrying out of fencing work that results in a dividing fence of a standard not greater than the standard for a sufficient dividing fence.


That’s classic legalese from the Dividing Fences Act 1991 (NSW). It means that where the existing fence is inadequate you (or your neighbour) generally must contribute equally to the cost of the fence that is reasonable in the circumstances. What is reasonable? The key here is what the court will consider to be a sufficient dividing fence.


The court will consider all the circumstances of the case when determining the standard for a sufficient dividing fence, including:

(a) the existing dividing fence (if any),

(b) the purposes for which the adjoining lands are used or intended to be used,

(c) the privacy or other concerns of the adjoining land owners,

(d) the kind of dividing fence usual in the locality, or

(e) any policy or code relating to dividing fences adopted by the local council in which the adjoining lands are situated.

Case study

In a recent example while building a new duplex a developer knocked down an old (dilapidated) wooden fence to provide ease of access for earthworks. Once the earthworks were complete the developer built a tall, double brick wall along the boundary line for privacy (other nearby properties used standard 1.8m high Colorbond fences). The owners of the adjoining property were shocked to receive a bill in the mail for more than $6,000, being half the cost of the new fence. A quick trip to their lawyers and some exchanges of correspondence later, the developer quickly dropped the claim and settled for half the cost of a standard Colorbond fence, saving the neighbour more than $5,000.

Knowing your rights

This is just one example in which knowing your rights and speaking with a competent lawyer in this area can be worthwhile. Disputes over fences are common and, if not handled carefully can turn once friendly relations between neighbours into awkward silences, steely glares and hostile territory.


If you are experiencing this or a similar issue or if you just want advice on your rights, contact us to help you find a solution.

Mark Evans Director Whiteacre Legal

Servicing all of NSW, Whiteacre provides expert property law and planning and environment law advice and assistance.

✓ Planning Law Advice

✓ Land and Environment Court Appeals

✓ Voluntary Planning Agreements and Contributions

✓ Development Control Orders and Enforcement

✓ Property Development Advice and Due Diligence

✓ Title Structuring

✓ Easements and Covenants

✓ Strata and Community Title legislation

Book an initial consultation through our website with our planning law solicitor. Whether it's about planning and environment law or property law, you can approach us and discuss your matter to make sure we are a good fit for your requirements.

BOOK ONLINE
shared driveways

Responsibility for maintenance of shared driveways

By Mark Evans • February 13, 2025
Shared driveways A common example of a shared driveway is where a right of carriageway passes through one neighbours’ (burdened) land into the other neighbour’s (benefited) land.
tiny homes

Tiny Homes, Caravans and Manufactured Homes in NSW Planning Law (Part 2)

By Mark Evans • November 27, 2024
In Part 1, we considered tiny homes and caravans on private land. That article can be accessed here Part 1 . In Part 2, we turn our attention to tiny homes and manufactured homes.
tiny homes

Tiny Homes, Caravans and Manufactured Homes in NSW Planning Law (Part 1)

By Mark Evans • November 22, 2024
In this article we explore tiny homes, caravans, and manufactured homes.

Understanding the Application of Savings Provisions to Development Applications

By Mark Evans and William Jamieson • November 14, 2024
The general rule is that a development application ( DA ) is to be determined based on the law applicable at the time of determination of the DA, not at the time of lodgement: Sofi v Wollondilly Shire Council (1975) 31 LGERA 416.
When subdivision may not be considered development carried out on land

When subdivision may not be considered development carried out on land

By Mark Evans and William Jamieson • October 31, 2024
Subdivision, alone, may not constitute development “on land” and thus trigger development restrictions. 
Biodiversity Credits

IPART Review of NSW Biodiversity Credit Market released

By Mark Evans • October 18, 2024
The Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal (IPART) has released a summary of workshops and stakeholders’ submissions concerning the functioning of the NSW Biodiversity Credits Market.
Development

Consent for Unauthorised Works

By Mark Evans and William Jamieson • October 10, 2024
It is now well established that a development consent cannot be obtained to authorise works that have already been carried out. The classic example is a building that has been built without development consent.
Planning law

Characterisation of Use in Planning Law

By Mark Evans and William Jamieson • September 26, 2024
This article discusses the characterisation of land use in NSW planning law.
Private Land

Ownership of Council assets on private land

By Mark Evans and Ryan Post • September 5, 2024
Public infrastructure like sewerage pipes and stormwater pipes were often constructed a long time ago with no development approval or accurate record keeping. Over time, these assets have remained in place and often the local council authority either has no record of the infrastructure or knowledge of the history of construction of the asset or its ownership. Ideally, Council would have an easement registered on title to the subject land. This can cause huge problems when seeking to develop land with old infrastructure emplaced within the subject site.

Establishing a Biodiversity Stewardship Site: Tax Implications

By Mark Evans • August 29, 2024
This article discusses tax implications of establishing a biodiversity stewardship site and generating biodiversity credits.
More Posts
Share by: