NSW Biodiversity Laws Review

William Jamieson and Mark Evans • August 9, 2024

Legislation in NSW aimed at protecting biodiversity is not working. The current system is complex and there are many reasons for failure. This article considers recent review of the NSW biodiversity legislation. 

Introduction

The NSW Government has recently responded to statutory reviews of the Biodiversity Conservation Act 2016 (‘BC Act’) and Local Land Services Act 2013 (‘LLS Act’). 


The NSW Government has committed to:

  • Reforming the biodiversity offsets scheme;
  • Stopping excess land clearing;
  • Strengthening food and fibre production;
  • Improving the protection and restoration of the environment;
  • Setting nature on a path to recovery, through a repair and regeneration model; and
  • Partnering with Aboriginal communities.


Biodiversity Conservation Act

The review of the BC Act found that it did not meet the purpose of ‘maintaining a healthy, productive, and resilient environment, and is never likely to do so’. The NSW Government has emphasised the need to rewrite the objects and structure of the BC Act. It intends to amend and strengthen the application of ecologically sustainable development, review other relevant legislation, and improve reporting on government biodiversity impacts and outcomes. Further commitments are grouped under six key pillars of reform.


1.      Nature Positive Strategy

  • This includes preparing and publishing a legally enforced NSW Nature Strategy with conservation and restoration goals and targets.
  • The strategy will guide investment and action to protect ecosystems and landscapes across tenures.


2.      Nature Positive Spatial Tools

  • The Government will map areas of current and future high biodiversity value.


3.      Nature Positive Development

  • The Government will amend the BC Act to require the Biodiversity Offsets Scheme to transition to overall ‘net positive’ outcomes. Currently, proponents must meet a lower threshold of ‘no net losses’.
  • Proponents will be required to demonstrate how they have genuinely avoided minimised biodiversity impacts. This will be supported by a public register of appropriate measures for developments.
  • Investment in the Biodiversity Credits Supply Fund will continue.
  • The Government will increase the efficiency and transparency of the Biodiversity Offsets Scheme, to better balance the application of this scheme with biodiversity risks.


4.      Species and Ecosystem Recovery

  • Improvements will be made to species and ecosystem programs and conservation initiatives.


5.      Data-informed decision-making

  • A natural capital accounting framework will be established to inform government decision-making.


6.      Leveraging private investment

  • Focus will be placed on building landholder capacity and boosting participation.
  • This includes diversifying and expanding investments and leveraging existing programs such as Landcare and the Biodiversity Conservation Trust.
  • Methodologies for natural capital activities and accounting will be developed.


Local Land Services Act

A review of the LLS Act affirmed its aims. It highlighted, however, the need for improved practical outcomes. The NSW Government intends to implement the recommendations made in the statutory review of the Act. This includes commitments to:


1.      Strengthen protections in Code-based clearing

  • Amending the Land Management (Native Vegetation) Code 2018 to reduce areas approved to be cleared.
  • Strengthening the prescriptions for managing invasive native species.
  • Specifying environmental management requirements for retained areas under the Pasture Expansion (Mosaic Thinning) provisions.
  • Removing discounts for set-aside areas.
  • Re-introducing a cap on equity clearing.
  • Increasing notification and certification requirements.


2.      Better manage environmental risks

  • Improving administration and outcomes of authorisations to manage environmental risk.
  • Developing a risk-based framework for responding to major climatic events.


3.      Reduce unallocated clearing

  • Reviewing the policy options for improving outcomes for areas containing predominantly non-woody vegetation.
  • Initiating a review into the further protection and restoration of biodiversity in regional landscapes.


4.      Expand and support incentives for landholders

  • Strengthening education and extension services for landholders.
  • Expanding incentives.


5.      Improve transparency and awareness of the Land Management Framework

  • Improving monitoring, evaluation, and reporting.
  • Net-change monitoring and reporting on woody vegetation loss and regrowth on rural regulated land.
  • Collaborating with local governments to reduce the risk of allowable activities being misused for non-agricultural clearing.


Key Takeaways

  • Significant changes to biodiversity legislation, particularly the BC Act, can be expected.
  • The Biodiversity Offsets Scheme will undergo major reform.
  • Stricter application of the LLS Act will aim to reduce land clearing.
  • Future projects in NSW will increasingly focus on biodiversity impacts.


The requirements under the BC Act can be complex and challenging for developers. We are currently assisting several landowners in establishing biodiversity stewardship sites resulting in the improvement and protection of significant areas of bushland and biodiversity. For developers and landowners alike the NSW scheme is complex and expensive. There are many potential pitfalls. 


Disclaimer

The contents of this article are a general guide and intended for educational purposes only. Determination of the types of issues discussed in this article is complex and often varies from case to case and involves an understanding of matters of fact and degree. Opinions on those matters can vary and be matters on which reasonable minds may differ.


DO NOT RELY ON THIS ARTICLE AS A SUBSTITUTE FOR COMPETENT LEGAL ADVICE.



Require further assistance? please do not hesitate to call us on (02) 9145 0900 or make an enquiry below.

A man in a suit is sitting on the steps of a building.

Servicing all of NSW, Whiteacre provides expert property law and planning and environment law advice and assistance.

Planning Law Advice

Land and Environment Court Appeals

Voluntary Planning Agreements and Contributions

Development Control Orders and Enforcement

Property Development Advice and Due Diligence

Title Structuring

Easements and Covenants

Strata and Community Title legislation

Book an initial consultation through our website with our planning law solicitor. Whether it's about planning and environment law or property law, you can approach us and discuss your matter to make sure we are a good fit for your requirements.

BOOK ONLINE
Navigating Land and Environment Court
By Mark Evans March 20, 2025
Expert Legal Insights on Development Approvals and Appeals with Planning Lawyer Mark Evans
Physical Commencement of Development Consents
By Mark Evans February 27, 2025
Development consents granted after 15 May 2020 face stricter requirements to determine whether they are substantially commenced and thus remain valid. This article reviews recent case law in New South Wales (NSW) and outlines the types of work that can qualify as physical commencement.
shared driveways
By Mark Evans February 13, 2025
Shared driveways A common example of a shared driveway is where a right of carriageway passes through one neighbours’ (burdened) land into the other neighbour’s (benefited) land.
tiny homes
By Mark Evans November 27, 2024
In Part 1, we considered tiny homes and caravans on private land. That article can be accessed here Part 1 . In Part 2, we turn our attention to tiny homes and manufactured homes.
tiny homes
By Mark Evans November 22, 2024
In this article we explore tiny homes, caravans, and manufactured homes.
By Mark Evans and William Jamieson November 14, 2024
The general rule is that a development application ( DA ) is to be determined based on the law applicable at the time of determination of the DA, not at the time of lodgement: Sofi v Wollondilly Shire Council (1975) 31 LGERA 416.
When subdivision may not be considered development carried out on land
By Mark Evans and William Jamieson October 31, 2024
Subdivision, alone, may not constitute development “on land” and thus trigger development restrictions. 
Biodiversity Credits
By Mark Evans October 18, 2024
The Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal (IPART) has released a summary of workshops and stakeholders’ submissions concerning the functioning of the NSW Biodiversity Credits Market.
Development
By Mark Evans and William Jamieson October 10, 2024
It is now well established that a development consent cannot be obtained to authorise works that have already been carried out. The classic example is a building that has been built without development consent.
Planning law
By Mark Evans and William Jamieson September 26, 2024
This article discusses the characterisation of land use in NSW planning law.
More Posts